The DFARS Final Rule took effect in November 2025. If you’re a defense contractor handling Federal Contract Information or Controlled Unclassified Information, you now need to demonstrate CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 compliance to win or renew DoD contracts. The problem is that most of the tools being sold as “CMMC compliance software” were originally built for SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and the evidence requirements are genuinely different.
I reviewed 8 CMMC compliance software platforms, looking specifically at how well each one handles the three things a C3PAO assessor will actually check: a complete System Security Plan, a tracked Plan of Action and Milestones, and a submitted SPRS score. Here’s what I found.
What CMMC 2.0 compliance software actually needs to do
CMMC 2.0 restructured the original five-level framework down to three levels. Level 1 covers 17 basic cybersecurity practices, Level 2 requires all 110 controls in NIST SP 800-171, and Level 3 adds 24 advanced controls from NIST SP 800-172. The vast majority of defense contractors need Level 2.
For Level 2, DoD requires three specific deliverables: a System Security Plan (SSP) documenting how you implement each of the 110 controls, a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) tracking any gaps and your remediation timeline, and a Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) score submitted to the DoD portal before you can be awarded a contract.
A SOC 2 tool is designed around TSC control families and auditor evidence packages, which don’t map neatly onto NIST 800-171 control numbers. If you use a platform that wasn’t built with CMMC in mind, you’ll likely generate the wrong evidence format, miss controls that don’t exist in SOC 2 land, and produce an SSP that a C3PAO assessor won’t accept.
The right CMMC compliance tools generate audit-ready SSPs, track your SPRS score as you implement controls, and store evidence in a way that survives a third-party assessment.
How we evaluated the best CMMC software in 2026
I looked at 9 platforms across these criteria:
- CMMC framework depth: Does the tool natively map to NIST 800-171/172 control numbers, or is CMMC a thin overlay on a SOC 2 framework?
- SSP and documentation quality: Can it generate a DoD-acceptable System Security Plan and POA&M automatically, or do you still build those in Word?
- SPRS score tracking: Does it calculate and update your SPRS score dynamically as controls are implemented?
- Evidence management: Does it provide a structured evidence repository aligned to CMMC assessment objectives?
- Pricing transparency: Is pricing publicly listed? I note clearly when it isn’t.
- Verified user reviews: G2, Capterra, and assessor-backed case studies only.
Quick comparison: 8 best CMMC compliance software tools
| Tool | Best for | Pricing | Standout feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta | Multi-framework teams | From ~$12K/yr | 400+ integrations, FedRAMP authorized |
| Drata | Structured compliance programs | From ~$7.5K/yr | AI-powered gap interpretation |
| Hyperproof | Enterprise, multiple frameworks | From ~$12K/yr | 140+ frameworks, auto SSP generation |
| Paramify | Documentation specialists and RPOs | From $8K/yr (L2) | OSCAL-based SSP/POA&M automation |
| Strike Graph | Mid-market, AI-first | $9K–$18K/yr | Verify AI evidence validation |
| Apptega | MSPs managing multiple clients | Free trial available | 14-day trial, framework crosswalking |
| FutureFeed | Small contractors on a budget | From $99/month | Live SPRS scoring, transparent pricing |
| MotherBear | CMMC-only consultants and SMBs | Contact for pricing | Built exclusively for CMMC |
The 8 best CMMC compliance software tools in 2026
1. Vanta
Vanta is the category default in the compliance automation space, and its CMMC support is genuinely deep. The platform covers Levels 1, 2, and 3, maps controls to NIST 800-171 and 800-172, runs automated evidence collection hourly across 400+ integrations, and holds FedRAMP 20x Moderate authorization on AWS GovCloud, which matters if your customer or assessor asks about your own security posture.
The strongest case for Vanta on CMMC is if you’re already using it for SOC 2 or ISO 27001. The cross-framework control reuse is real: evidence you collect for one framework populates against mapped controls in another, so you’re not starting from scratch. Vanta also has a network of Cyber AB-listed RPOs and C3PAOs (A-LIGN, Schellman, Insight Assurance) built into the platform, so you can go from assessment readiness to audit partner without leaving the product.
The downside is pricing. If CMMC is your only framework, Vanta is expensive for what you’re getting. For SMBs, expect $12,000 to $25,000 per year. Pricing requires a sales call, and the CMMC module sits on top of a broader platform that will have features you’ll never use as a defense contractor. For a deeper look, see our Vanta pricing breakdown and Vanta alternatives.
Key features:
- CMMC Level 1, 2, and 3 with NIST 800-171/172 control pre-mapping
- Hourly automated evidence collection across 400+ integrations
- SSP and POA&M management from a unified dashboard
- Cross-framework control reuse across CMMC, SOC 2, FedRAMP, ISO 27001
- FedRAMP 20x Moderate authorization (AWS GovCloud)
- Cyber AB-listed RPO and C3PAO partner network
- Deepest integration library in this category (400+)
- FedRAMP authorized, which some DoD customers require
- Strong C3PAO partner network built into the platform
- Evidence reuse across frameworks genuinely works
- No public pricing; requires a sales call
- Expensive for CMMC-only use cases
- CMMC is an add-on to a broader platform, not the core product
- Renewals typically climb 10–20% per year
Pricing: From ~$12,000/yr for SMBs (1–50 employees); $20,000–$40,000/yr for mid-market; enterprise custom. No public pricing.
Best for: Organizations already on Vanta for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 that need to add CMMC without rebuilding their compliance program.
2. Drata
Drata positions CMMC as a structured compliance operating system rather than a one-time certification exercise. Its level picker lets you select Level 1, 2, or 3 at setup, which automatically scopes the requirements so you’re not staring at 110 controls when you only need 17. The AI-powered gap interpretation is genuinely useful: it reads your current control state and explains what needs to change before affirmation, rather than just flagging a control as “not implemented.”
The continuous monitoring is solid. Drata tracks configuration drift across your CUI-related systems, which matters for CMMC because the standard requires ongoing protection, not just a point-in-time snapshot. POA&M tracking is built in with ownership assignment and remediation timelines. Evidence consolidation across repeat assessments is one of the better-executed features here, especially useful for contractors who go through multiple self-assessments before a C3PAO review.
Drata is also worth considering if you need CMMC alongside another framework. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA, and PCI DSS with cross-framework control mapping. Our Drata review covers the full platform in more detail.
The entry price ($7,500/year for the Foundation tier) makes it the most accessible of the large GRC platforms on this list, but renewals reportedly climb 10–20% per year, so factor that into a multi-year projection.
Key features:
- Tiered level picker for CMMC Level 1, 2, and 3
- AI-powered gap interpretation for assessment affirmation readiness
- Continuous CUI monitoring with configuration drift detection
- POA&M tracking with ownership, remediation workflows, and timelines
- Cross-framework control mapping across SOC 2, FedRAMP, NIST 800-53
- Supplier security assessment for supply chain risk management
- Strongest AI-assisted gap analysis in the category
- Level-scoped setup reduces noise for Level 1 contractors
- Foundation tier is the most affordable entry point among large GRC platforms
- No per-seat pricing (unlimited users across all tiers)
- Renewals climb 10–20% per year; multi-year cost is higher than it first appears
- Enterprise-first UX can feel heavy for small contractor teams
- Integration count is lower than Vanta’s 400+
Pricing: Foundation $7,500–$15,000/yr (one framework, up to 50 employees); Advanced $15,000–$25,000/yr; Enterprise $25,000–$100,000+/yr. No public pricing.
Best for: Mid-market defense contractors managing CMMC alongside SOC 2, FedRAMP, or NIST 800-53 who need a structured, continuously monitored compliance program.
3. Hyperproof
Hyperproof is built for compliance teams managing multiple frameworks at once, and its CMMC support reflects that. Out-of-the-box CMMC 2.0 templates, automated evidence collection, scheduled control testing, and automatic SSP generation from compliance data are all included. The feature that sets it apart is Jumpstart: a cross-framework mapping tool that links your CMMC controls to overlapping requirements in FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, SOC 2, or any of the 140+ frameworks it supports.
If you’re a defense contractor also pursuing FedRAMP authorization or managing a SOC 2 program for commercial customers, Hyperproof’s control reuse can save a significant amount of redundant work. You collect evidence once, it maps across frameworks. The compliance dashboards are strong too, giving program leads a real-time view of where each domain stands.
For pure CMMC use (one framework, one certification), Hyperproof is probably more platform than you need. It’s priced to match: entry is around $12,000/year, and mid-size organizations typically pay $16,000 to $32,000. There’s also a reported $10,000 implementation fee that some customers have negotiated away on multi-year deals. See our Hyperproof review for a full breakdown.
Key features:
- Out-of-the-box CMMC 2.0 templates with pre-mapped controls
- Automatic SSP generation exported directly from compliance data
- Jumpstart: cross-framework control mapping across 140+ frameworks
- 140+ integrations including AWS, Azure, CrowdStrike, Datadog
- Scheduled automated control testing
- Real-time compliance dashboards by domain and control family
- Best cross-framework control reuse for teams managing CMMC alongside FedRAMP or SOC 2
- Automatic SSP generation is genuinely solid
- 140+ framework library is the deepest on this list
- Strong customer base across mid-market and enterprise (Reddit, Nutanix, Fortinet)
- Expensive for CMMC-only use; implementation fees may apply
- Initial learning curve for new users
- Fewer customization options in reporting than some teams need
Pricing: From ~$12,000/yr; median deal around $40,000/yr for mid-size organizations. Implementation fee reported; negotiable on multi-year contracts. No public pricing.
Best for: Larger defense contractors and enterprises managing CMMC alongside FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, and commercial compliance programs.
4. Paramify
Paramify solves a specific problem: generating audit-ready CMMC documentation that actually looks like what a C3PAO assessor expects to see. Using an OSCAL-based (Open Security Controls Assessment Language) single source of truth, it auto-generates your System Security Plan, POA&M, policies, and procedures from a structured data model. Enter your control implementation details once, and Paramify outputs formatted documents for CMMC, FedRAMP, FISMA, and other frameworks simultaneously.
The SPRS tracking is dynamic: as you implement controls and update your Paramify data, your SPRS score recalculates in real time. That feedback loop is useful for planning conversations with leadership and for tracking progress toward assessment readiness. Jira integration means remediation tasks flow into the tools your engineers already use, rather than a separate compliance ticket queue.
Paramify is used heavily by RPOs (Registered Provider Organizations), MSPs, and advisory firms managing CMMC programs across multiple clients. If you’re a contractor working directly with an RPO, there’s a good chance they’re already using Paramify to generate your documentation. For individual contractors, the L2 pricing ($8,000 to $25,000/year) is competitive with Vanta and Drata for what you get in documentation output.
The limitation is that Paramify is a documentation and tracking platform, not a monitoring platform. It won’t collect evidence from your AWS environment or run automated control tests. You still need the technical controls in place; Paramify helps you prove it on paper.
Key features:
- OSCAL-based SSP, policy, and procedure auto-generation
- Dynamic SPRS score tracking updated as controls are implemented
- Single source of truth: data entered once, outputs across CMMC, FedRAMP, FISMA, SOC 2
- POA&M management with gap assessment and remediation tracking
- Jira integration for remediation workflows
- CMMC Level 2 and Level 3 support
- Most efficient SSP/POA&M generation in the category
- SPRS score updates automatically as controls are implemented
- RPO and MSP adoption means strong ecosystem integration
- Cross-framework output from a single data source
- Not a monitoring platform: evidence collection and control testing are out of scope
- Very few public reviews (Capterra: 5.0/5 across 3 reviews only)
- L3 pricing is significant ($35,000–$70,000/year)
Pricing: CMMC Level 2: $8,000–$25,000/yr; CMMC Level 3: $35,000–$70,000/yr. No public pricing page; quote required.
Best for: RPOs, MSPs, and defense contractors whose primary bottleneck is generating accurate, audit-ready CMMC documentation at scale.
5. Strike Graph
Strike Graph is the only platform on this list with a patent-pending AI feature specifically for CMMC evidence validation. Verify AI automatically reviews evidence you’ve collected against Level 1, 2, and 3 control requirements and tells you whether it’s sufficient before your C3PAO assessor does. For contractors who’ve been through the anxiety of submitting evidence packages and finding out in the assessment room that something doesn’t meet requirements, this is a meaningful capability.
The platform supports all three CMMC levels with NIST 800-171/172 control mappings, auto-generates SSPs from compliance data, and manages POA&M tracking with real-time gap updates. It also launched a free CMMC self-assessment toolkit in October 2025 ahead of the DFARS deadline, which is genuinely useful for contractors who want to understand their posture before committing to a platform.
The proof point that stands out: Sanmina, a large defense manufacturer, used Strike Graph for five separate CMMC assessments and passed all five, with 600+ evidence artifacts per plant. That’s a real-world result, not a vendor case study. Our Strike Graph review has more detail if you want to go deeper.
Pricing is flat and transparent: $9,000/year for the Certify plan, $18,000/year for Scale. No per-user fees, and multi-year contracts lock the price.
Key features:
- Verify AI: patent-pending evidence validation against CMMC Level 1, 2, and 3 controls
- Auto-generated SSPs exported directly from platform compliance data
- POA&M management with real-time gap tracking
- Free CMMC self-assessment toolkit for Level 1 and Level 2 readiness
- SBOM Manager for software component tracking
- 30+ frameworks including NIST 800-171/172, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA
- Transparent flat pricing with no per-user fees
- AI evidence validation is a genuinely novel capability in this space
- Free self-assessment toolkit before you commit to the platform
- Verified pass record across multiple CMMC assessments (Sanmina)
- Smaller customer base and fewer integrations than Vanta or Drata
- Scale plan ($18,000/year) may be expensive for small, single-framework contractors
Pricing: Certify: $9,000/yr; Scale: $18,000/yr. Multi-year contracts lock pricing. No per-user fees.
Best for: Mid-market defense contractors that want predictable pricing, AI evidence validation, and a proven track record across multiple CMMC assessments.
6. Apptega
Apptega is built for MSPs and CMMC consultants managing compliance programs across multiple defense contractor clients, and its architecture shows it. Pre-built CMMC 2.0 questionnaires reduce assessment time from days to hours. One-click audit reports generate at the end of each compliance cycle. The Harmony feature crosswalks your CMMC controls against NIST 800-171 and other frameworks simultaneously, so you’re not re-entering data when a client has overlapping requirements.
For individual defense contractors, Apptega is a solid option if you want a 14-day free trial before committing. That’s genuinely rare in this category: most platforms on this list require a sales call just to see pricing. Apptega’s free tier gives you access to the interface and a limited feature set, and the trial gives you two weeks to validate whether it fits your workflow.
The G2 rating is the highest of any tool on this list (4.8/5 across 152 reviews), which reflects consistent user satisfaction with the platform and support team. The limitation is that Apptega is better suited to managed service providers and consultants than to individual contractors running their own internal compliance programs. The feature set and pricing model both tilt in that direction.
Key features:
- Pre-built CMMC 2.0 questionnaires reducing assessment time from days to hours
- Harmony framework crosswalking: CMMC overlaid against NIST 800-171, SOC 2, and 20+ others
- One-click audit-ready compliance report generation
- Mitigation workflow management for pre-assessment gap remediation
- Third-party vendor evaluation and risk management
- 14-day free trial; free Starter plan available
- Highest rating on this list (4.8/5 across 152 reviews)
- 14-day free trial (unique in this category)
- MSP-optimized architecture for multi-client management
- Strong NIST 800-171 crosswalk and framework mapping
- Advanced/Premium pricing not public; reported above $20,000/year for small teams
- Better suited to MSPs and consultants than individual contractors
- Fewer integrations than Vanta or Hyperproof
Pricing: Starter: free. Advanced and Premium: contact for pricing (reported above $20,000/year for teams under 5). 14-day free trial available.
Best for: MSPs and CMMC RPO/consulting firms managing compliance programs across multiple defense contractor clients.
7. FutureFeed
FutureFeed has the most transparent pricing of any platform on this list, and it was built specifically for the Defense Industrial Base. The core workflow is guided: you answer a structured questionnaire based on NIST SP 800-171 control requirements, and FutureFeed automatically calculates your SPRS score, generates your SSP, and produces your POA&M. As you implement controls and update your answers, the SPRS score updates in real time.
CMMC Level 1 is included in all plans at no extra charge. Level 2 (the full 110-control NIST 800-171 program with dynamic SPRS scoring) is an add-on at $168/month. All documentation is stored in FedRAMP High authorized AWS GovCloud, which meets DoD’s security requirements for handling compliance records.
FutureFeed is the right call if you’re a small contractor with 25 or fewer employees and a tight budget. At $99/month base plus $168/month for the Level 2 add-on, you’re looking at roughly $3,200/year for a complete CMMC Level 2 program. That’s a fraction of what Vanta or Drata will quote you. The 1,400+ clients and 300+ RPO/MSP partner network suggests real adoption in the DIB community, though the lack of G2 or Capterra reviews makes independent quality validation difficult.
Key features:
- Automatic SPRS score calculation and real-time updates as controls are implemented
- SSP, POA&M, and gap assessment generated from guided questionnaire workflow
- CMMC Level 1 included in all plans; Level 2 add-on at $168/month
- FedRAMP High authorized AWS GovCloud storage for all compliance documents
- CMMC Expertise Marketplace connecting contractors with RPOs and C3PAOs
- Embedded micro-training per control (videos and written guides)
- Most transparent and affordable pricing in this roundup
- Real-time SPRS scoring is genuinely useful for tracking progress
- FedRAMP High authorized document storage meets DoD requirements
- Large partner network (300+ RPOs and MSPs)
- No G2 or Capterra reviews available for independent quality assessment
- Limited integrations compared to GRC platform leaders
- Less name recognition than larger compliance automation platforms
Pricing: Innovator: $99/month (up to 25 FTEs); Standard: $399/month (26–999 FTEs); Enterprise: custom. CMMC Level 2 add-on: $168/month. CMMC Level 3 add-on: $10,000/year.
Best for: Small defense contractors (up to 50 employees) that need live SPRS tracking and DoD-required documentation at an affordable, publicly listed monthly price.
8. MotherBear
MotherBear was founded by a Navy veteran who saw how chaotic most small contractors’ CMMC programs were, and built a platform that removes the noise. Every feature maps directly to CMMC assessment objectives. There are no GRC features you won’t use, no ISO 27001 framework you didn’t ask for, no risk register templates that don’t apply to your DoD contract. It’s CMMC, end to end.
The platform covers requirements tracking (with built-in NIST 800-171 control mappings), a documentation builder for your SSP, policies, and procedures, a centralized evidence repository, and task management to keep your team accountable to deadlines and control owners. An AI-powered readiness review is in development. MotherBear also has a multi-client portal for MSPs and CMMC consultants managing programs across multiple contractor clients.
The honest caveat: MotherBear is a young company. There are no G2 or Capterra reviews, pricing requires a conversation with their team, and the AI features aren’t shipped yet. For a small contractor who wants a CMMC-only tool without paying for features they’ll never need, it’s worth evaluating. But you’re making a judgment call on a platform without much third-party validation.
Key features:
- Requirements Tracker with built-in CMMC and NIST 800-171 control mappings
- Documentation Builder for SSP, policies, and procedures
- Evidence Repository with centralized, categorized storage
- Task Management tied to CMMC controls with team accountability
- Asset Management for scoping and tracking in-scope systems
- Multi-client MSP portal for consultants managing multiple programs
- CMMC-only focus: no GRC complexity you don’t need
- Built by someone with real defense industry context (Navy veteran founder)
- Clean interface for small teams without a dedicated compliance officer
- MSP/consultant architecture for multi-client use
- No public pricing; requires a sales conversation
- No G2 or Capterra reviews for independent validation
- AI Readiness Review still in development
- Early-stage company with limited public track record
Pricing: Core, Plus, and Ultimate tiers. Contact for pricing.
Best for: Small defense contractors (1–50 employees) and CMMC consultants who want a CMMC-exclusive platform without paying for GRC features they’ll never use.
How to choose CMMC compliance software
CMMC readiness software vs. full GRC platform: which do you need?
If CMMC is your only framework and you’re a small contractor, purpose-built CMMC compliance tools (FutureFeed, MotherBear) will serve you better and cost significantly less than a general GRC platform. The GRC platforms on this list (Vanta, Drata, Hyperproof) earn their price when you’re managing CMMC alongside SOC 2, FedRAMP, NIST 800-53, or ISO 27001 from a shared control library. If you’re not doing that, you’re paying for features you’ll never touch.
A useful question to ask: how many compliance frameworks do you need to manage in the next two years? If the answer is one, go purpose-built. If the answer is two or more, a platform with cross-framework control reuse will pay for itself faster than maintaining two separate tools.
What to look for in CMMC assessment software
Three deliverables are non-negotiable for any C3PAO assessment: a complete System Security Plan, an active POA&M, and a current SPRS score on file with DoD. Before selecting a platform, confirm that it generates each of these in a format that assessors recognize, not a custom proprietary export.
Ask the vendor specifically: can it generate an SSP that follows NIST 800-171A assessment procedure format? Can it produce a POA&M with the fields and structure DoD expects? Does it track SPRS scores and have a submission workflow? If any of these answers are vague, that’s a problem.
Are you an MSP or RPO managing multiple clients?
Apptega and Paramify have the most mature multi-client architectures on this list. FutureFeed has a 300+ partner program for RPOs and MSPs. If you’re running CMMC programs for multiple defense contractors, a single-tenant tool will become unmanageable quickly. Evaluate platforms on client isolation, per-client billing, and whether you can generate separate SSPs and evidence packages per engagement from a shared control library.
What CMMC level do you need?
Level 1 (17 practices based on FAR 52.204-21) is required for contractors handling Federal Contract Information. Level 2 (110 NIST 800-171 controls) is required for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information and covers the vast majority of defense contractors. Level 3 (NIST 800-172) applies to contractors working on the DoD’s highest-priority programs and is assessed by the Defense Contract Management Agency.
FutureFeed includes Level 1 for free in all plans. Most platforms on this list treat Level 2 as the baseline. For Level 3, Paramify, Vanta, Drata, Hyperproof, and Strike Graph all have confirmed support.
Buying guidance by company stage
If you have fewer than 25 employees and a single DoD contract: FutureFeed ($99/month + $168/month Level 2 add-on) is the right starting point — transparent pricing, real-time SPRS tracking, no enterprise overhead.
If you have 25 to 200 employees or multiple contracts: Strike Graph ($9,000–$18,000/year flat) or Drata (Foundation tier from $7,500/year) give you structure and automation without enterprise pricing.
If you have 200+ employees, multiple frameworks, or a FedRAMP procurement requirement: Vanta or Hyperproof at their respective price points, with dedicated support at scale.
Frequently asked questions
What’s the best CMMC compliance software for DoD contractors?
It depends on your size and scope. For small contractors (under 25 employees), FutureFeed ($99/month base + $168/month Level 2 add-on) offers the most transparent pricing with real-time SPRS tracking. For mid-market teams managing CMMC alongside other frameworks, Vanta or Drata give you the deepest cross-framework automation.
What is the best compliance software for CMMC readiness?
CMMC readiness specifically means being ready for a C3PAO third-party assessment. The tools that do this best generate DoD-acceptable SSPs, track your SPRS score dynamically, and organize evidence by NIST 800-171 control number. FutureFeed, Paramify, and Strike Graph all do this well. Vanta and Drata are strong on automation and monitoring but require more configuration to get the documentation format right.
What is CMMC compliance?
CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) is the DoD’s framework for ensuring defense contractors meet cybersecurity requirements before they can bid on or hold federal contracts. It has three levels tied to NIST SP 800-171 and 800-172 controls, with Level 2 being the standard requirement for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information. As of November 2025, CMMC requirements are contractually enforced through the DFARS Final Rule.
Which security software has the best CMMC compliance offerings?
For platform breadth and integration depth, Vanta and Drata lead. For purpose-built CMMC tooling, FutureFeed (SPRS tracking with a guided questionnaire workflow) and MotherBear (CMMC-only platform) are the most focused options for defense contractors specifically.
Do I need CMMC Level 2 or Level 3?
Most defense contractors need Level 2, which requires implementing all 110 controls in NIST SP 800-171 and undergoing a third-party assessment by a certified C3PAO. Level 3 applies to a smaller subset of contractors working on the DoD’s highest-priority programs; it requires an additional 24 controls from NIST SP 800-172 and is assessed by the Defense Contract Management Agency rather than a C3PAO.
How much does CMMC compliance software cost?
Ranges from $99/month (FutureFeed Innovator plan) to $60,000+ per year for enterprise GRC platforms like Vanta and Hyperproof. Mid-market options typically run $8,000 to $25,000 per year. The total cost of CMMC certification including software, assessment fees, and any remediation work can range from $5,000 to $150,000+ depending on your organization size and current security posture.
Can I use one tool for both CMMC and SOC 2?
Yes. Vanta, Drata, Hyperproof, and Strike Graph all support both CMMC and SOC 2 from a shared control library. Cross-framework control mapping means evidence collected for CMMC can map to overlapping SOC 2 trust services criteria, reducing duplicate work. If you’re pursuing both frameworks simultaneously, a unified platform will save meaningful time compared to running two separate tools.
What is an SPRS score and which tools track it?
The Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) score is a DoD-mandated self-assessment score that defense contractors must submit before they can be awarded a contract. It’s calculated by assigning point values to each of the 110 NIST 800-171 controls: a perfect score is 110, and controls that aren’t implemented subtract points. Tools that track SPRS dynamically as you implement controls: FutureFeed, Paramify, and Strike Graph. Vanta and Drata can track SPRS but require more configuration to surface it clearly.
Final thoughts
The CMMC compliance software category is more fragmented than SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and for good reason: the requirements are specific to the defense sector, the documentation expectations are different, and the consequences of getting it wrong are higher. A failed C3PAO assessment doesn’t mean you redo your evidence. It can mean you lose your contract.
Small contractors with one or two DoD contracts should start with FutureFeed. Teams managing CMMC as part of a broader compliance program should evaluate Drata or Vanta. If SSP and POA&M generation is the bottleneck, Paramify is the most purpose-built tool for that specific job. Whatever you choose, verify that it generates a DoD-acceptable SSP and tracks your SPRS score. Those are the two things that matter most when a C3PAO assessor walks in.






